Essays · board mandates · parent FAQ · open-source

The work behind the product.

Essays, case studies, open-source artefacts, and the DPDP playbook we wish every Indian school had. The brand we're trying to build is the kind that lives in your library shelf, not your inbox.

Board mandate guides

The per-board regulatory landscape from Deshika's brain. Anchored to public-source citations: PIB notifications, IBO Mumbai 2026 principles, CISCE syllabi, MoE press releases, state-board circulars.

CBSE

CBSE Class-3 AI mandate (AY 2026-27)

The strictest hard deadline in Indian K-12 AI. MoE notification 30-Oct-2025 + CBSE follow-up circular: AI becomes compulsory in Class 3 from AY 2026-27 (April 2026), then progressively rolled up. Class 9-10 will be board-examined on AI from AY 2027-28. The Class 3 mandate is non-elective — every CBSE-affiliated school must comply.

What this means for your school: if you're CBSE, the next 18 months are not optional. You need a Class 3 AI curriculum, a vetted AI tool the policy can authorise, a parent-comms plan, and an AI policy your trustees can sign before the April rollout. Kendriya Vidyalaya (1,289 schools) and Navodaya (661 schools) inherit this automatically as central-govt schools.

What's gated: affiliation renewals will reference AI-readiness. Sahodaya cluster meets are now AI-agenda-dominated. Most early CBSE adopters spent Q1 2026 writing policy and Q2 2026 ordering tools.

Sources: PIB 30-Oct-2025 notification · CBSE circular Acad-93/2025 · brain page cbse-ai-mandate

CISCE

CISCE — Robotics & AI, Subject 66 + ISC 883

No compulsion. CISCE has not mandated AI as a compulsory subject. Instead, AI is offered as Group III elective Subject 66 (Robotics & AI) for ICSE Class 9-10 and Subject 883 for ISC Class 11-12. The first ICSE-66 board exam ran 23 February 2026.

What this means for your school: if you're CISCE-affiliated (ICSE / ISC), AI is opt-in at student level. You can offer Subject 66 if you have at least one trained teacher and the resource block in your timetable. CISCE has published syllabus + sample papers for both subjects; they read more academic than CBSE's curriculum (more discrete-math, less applied-tool).

What's coming: CISCE indicated (May 2026 council note) it is monitoring student-uptake of Subject 66 for 3 years before deciding on broader compulsion. Most ICSE schools currently treat AI as a co-curricular activity, not a board-exam subject.

Sources: CISCE Subject 66 syllabus (Feb 2025 release) · ISC 883 syllabus · brain page icse-cisce-ai-mandate

STATE

State boards — Karnataka, Chhattisgarh, Assam, Tripura, others

None of the 25+ state boards has a CBSE-equivalent compulsory AI mandate as of May 2026. But four states have named, public AI-in-schools partners and pilots running:

  • Karnataka. Shiksha Copilot — Microsoft + Sikshana Foundation, teacher-side AI assistant for govt + aided schools. Started 2024. State-DSC + KSEEB-aware.
  • Chhattisgarh. Magic Bus — 800 govt schools across Bastar division, AI-supplemented teacher training + student literacy. Started 2025.
  • Assam. IIT-Guwahati + Tata-NELCO partnership for Assamese-medium AI curriculum content for SEBA-affiliated schools. Pilot-stage as of Q1 2026.
  • Tripura. Mission Vidyajyoti (state) + IIT-G discussion ongoing for Bengali-medium and Kokborok-medium AI material. Earliest stage.

What this means for your school: if you're a state-board school in one of these four states, your state has a first-mover partner already. Deshika sits alongside them as the parent-policy + vernacular safety + board-exam-practice layer those partners don't ship. Other states (UP, MP, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Kerala etc.) are in earlier stages — state SCERT-level discussions, no published partners yet.

Sources: KA state DSC orders · CG Magic Bus disclosures · IIT-G + Tata-NELCO Q1 2026 brief · brain page state-board-ai-mandate

IB

IBO — Appendix 6 + 5 March 2026 Mumbai AI Design Principles

No compulsion. IBO Appendix 6 (May 2023) authorises AI use in PYP/MYP/DP assessment with caveats. The 5 March 2026 Mumbai Symposium produced 7 AI Design Principles (the most operationally specific guidance the IB has issued) — but these are principles, not a curriculum.

What this means for your school: if you're an IB World School (~270 in India), AI policy and academic-integrity authentication is pushed DOWN to the IB coordinator and the school's leadership. There is no IBO-published curriculum unit. You are expected to author your own AI policy aligned to the Mumbai principles, train your coordinators on AI-assisted-work detection, and document your authentication procedures. The DP Theory of Knowledge (TOK) curriculum has been informally expanded to include AI-epistemology.

What's coming: IBO has signalled it will issue clearer subject-level AI guidance for the DP 2027 cohort. Until then, the responsibility is the school's.

Sources: IBO Appendix 6 (May 2023) · IBO Mumbai Symposium 5 March 2026 · brain page ib-ibo-ai-policy

CAMBRIDGE

Cambridge IGCSE — coursework rule + 0478 Topic 6

Guidance, not mandate. Cambridge International has issued AI usage guidance for coursework (Sep 2023 + Q1 2025 updates) — students may use AI for ideation but not for submission; all AI use must be declared. AI content (Topic 6) sits at ~8-10% paper weight in the Computer Science 0478 syllabus.

What this means for your school: if you're Cambridge-affiliated (~700+ Indian schools), your Exams Officer and Head of Computing carry the AI workload. Cambridge expects schools to maintain documented AI-use-declaration logs for any submitted coursework. Cambridge has not mandated curricular AI in subjects other than Computer Science, but the Pearson Edexcel parallel route is published similar guidance.

What's coming: Cambridge has indicated a 2027-2028 review cycle that may upgrade guidance to mandate; until then the Indian Cambridge schools are setting their own bar.

Sources: Cambridge International AI-use guidance (Q1 2025) · IGCSE 0478 syllabus · brain page igcse-cambridge-ai-policy

GOVT

Government schools — three stacked mandates

Three layered policy frameworks govern govt schools.

  • National Education Policy 2020 (NEP) — strategic framework, includes AI/ICT integration aspirations from Foundational Stage.
  • National Curriculum Framework 2023 (NCF for School Education) — operationalises NEP, names AI literacy as Stage 3 (Preparatory) and Stage 4 (Middle) outcome.
  • MoE 30-Oct-2025 notification — the binding instrument: Class 3 mandate AY 2026-27 for CBSE-affiliated central-govt schools (KVS + NVS) and an aspirational compliance for state-managed schools (where state SCERT prepares the syllabus).

What this means: 1,289 Kendriya Vidyalayas + 661 Navodayas + ~10 lakh state-managed govt schools fall under different layers of this stack. KVS + NVS inherit CBSE timing automatically. State-managed govt-school AI rollout depends on each SCERT preparing Hindi / regional-language syllabus material and Samagra Shiksha funding the teacher upskilling cycle (NISHTHA platform, ~37 lakh teachers).

What's gated: Samagra Shiksha PAB allocations for FY 2026-27 include an AI-teacher-training line item for the first time. State-budget approvals roll through Q2-Q3 2026.

Sources: NEP 2020 · NCF-SE 2023 · MoE notification 30-Oct-2025 · Samagra Shiksha PAB 2026 · NISHTHA portal · brain page govt-school-ai-curriculum

Open-source roadmap

The moat we want is brand authorship, not lock-in. Each artefact below has a published target date and a publication channel (GitHub or CC-BY-SA).

Q3 2026: AI Policy Starter Pack (all 7 templates) — opens after 25 schools have co-authored their policies from these starting points. Q2 2027: Indic safety classifier weights + evaluation harness. With data-flywheel pledge launch: Differential-privacy aggregation library.

One thoughtful essay a month.

No marketing. Unsubscribe in one click. Topics: post-BYJU's Indian ed-tech, DPDP enforcement, child-safe AI, the Indic safety gap, what the brain is teaching us.